tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-54726430100603281772024-03-18T21:51:34.203-07:00Battle of Britain 1940Churchill said, "If the British Empire [were] to last a thousand years, men would still say, this was their finest hour." Less than a century on and a recent survey has shown that most people have forgotten it already. Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.comBlogger21125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-43481509618137783692016-07-06T17:51:00.000-07:002016-07-06T17:51:07.172-07:00"The Battle of Britain is about to begin"<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
The Battle of Britain is unusual in that it was named before it was fought. Its name came from Prime Minister Winston Churchill in his famous speech of 18 June 1940:<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">What </span>General Weygand<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"> has called The </span>Battle of France<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"> is over. </span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">The battle of Britain is about to begin. </span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilisation. </span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Upon it depends our own British life and the long continuity of our institutions and our Empire. </span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">The whole fury and might of the enemy must very soon be turned on us. </span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this island or lose the war. </span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. </span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of a perverted science. </span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, "This was their finest hour".</span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<i><span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 14px;">The Battle of Britain was the first major campaign fought entirely by air forces. British historians have defined the duration as from 10 July 1940 to 31 October 1940.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 14px;">The primary objective of Nazi Germany was to achieve a negotiated peace settlement with Britain.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 14px;">In July 1940, an air and sea blockade began with the Luftwaffe mainly </span><span style="font-size: 14px;">targeting coastal shipping convoys, ports and shipping centres.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">On 1 August 1940, the Luftwaffe was directed to achieve air superiority over the RAF with the aim of incapacitating RAF Fighter Command.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">Twelve days later the Luftwaffe shifted its attacks to RAF airfields and infrastructure. </span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">As the Battle progressed, the Luftwaffe also targeted factories involved in the aircraft production and strategic infrastructure. </span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">Eventually, it employed terror bombing on areas of political significance and civilians.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">By denying the Luftwaffe air superiority over England, the British forced Hitler to postpone and eventually cancel an amphibious and airborne invasion of Britain, Operation Sea Lion.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">by Steve Dunster</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
<span style="color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br /></span></span></div>
</div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-65876472173643253402016-07-05T13:32:00.002-07:002016-07-05T14:18:57.590-07:00Why did the Ju 88 Germany's newest bomber suffer so many losses?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
During the Battle of Britain, the Luftwaffe employed three types of level bombers and one type of dive bomber.<br />
<br />
The dive bomber was the Junkers Ju 87 Stuka. It was primarily designed for troops support and it was devastatingly successful in this role during the Battle of France. But during the Battle of Britain, the Stuka suffered heavy losses due to its slow speed and it being vulnerable to fighter interception after diving on its target. The Stuka had limited payload and range and when its losses increased they were removed from operations over England.<br />
<br />
The Luftwaffe had three bomber types it used for medium and high altitude level bombing, they were the Heinkel He 111, the Dornier Do 17 and the Junkers Ju 88.<br />
<br />
Of these the He 111 was used in the greatest numbers and was the slowest. The Ju 88 was the newest and the fastest once it had dropped its mainly external bomb load. The Do 17 had the smallest bomb load.<br />
<br />
All three level bomber types suffered heavy losses from British fighters but the Ju 88 disproportionately so.<br />
<br />
<i><b>Germany's newest bomber</b></i><br />
<br />
The Junkers Ju 88 was developed in the late 1930s as a "fast-bomber" - a concept based on the fact that the Ju 88 would be supposedly so fast that fighters couldn't intercept it.<br />
<br />
When the prototype Ju 88 V1 first flew, it achieved 360 mph. Georing (head of the Luftwaffe) was very impressed. Its streamlined fuselage was modelled on the Do 17 but with fewer defensive guns because of the belief that it could out-run late 1930s fighters.<br />
<br />
Sadly by the time Luftwaffe planners like Ernst Udet had "improved" it with features added (including modifying it for heavy dive-bombing), the Ju 88's top speed had dropped to 280 mph.<br />
<br />
The A-1 series prototypes were given Jumo 211B-1 or G powerplants and was the favoured variant by Georing for mass production. He was promised 300 Ju 88s a month.<br />
<br />
Production was delayed terribly by developmental problems, causing service introduction to be over a year late. Only 12 Ju 88s were in service by the time Germany invaded Poland.<br />
<br />
Even then, production was dreadfully slow with only one Ju 88 manufactured a week as problems continued.<br />
<br />
<i><b>How bad were the Ju 88 losses over Britain?</b></i><br />
<br />
By August 1940 Ju 88 A-1s and A-5s were reaching operational units just as the Battle of Britain was intensifying.<br />
<br />
Sadly for the Luftwaffe, the Ju 88s higher speed did not prevent its losses exceeding those of the Do 17 and the He 111.<br />
<br />
<i><b>Ju 88</b> losses over Britain between July and October 1940 amounted to <b>303</b> aircraft.</i><br />
<i><b>Do 17</b> losses over Britain between July and October 1940 amounted to <b>132</b> aircraft.</i><br />
<i><b>He 111</b> losses over Britain between July and October 1940 amounted to <b>252</b> aircraft.</i><br />
<br />
<i><b>Why did the Junkers Ju 88 suffer so many losses?</b></i><br />
<i><br /></i>
A considerable number of the Ju 88 losses were down to the aircraft's difficult behaviour compared with the proven He 111, and the crews' lack of experience on the type. Many crews had only converted to the Ju 88 only shortly before.<br />
<br />
Of the 39 losses recorded for July 1940, only 20 were due to enemy action. The others were due to training accidents, crashes or malfunctions over mainland Europe.<br />
<br />
A series of field modifications were implemented to make the Ju 88 less vulnerable, including replacing the single MG 15 rear machine gun with a twin-barrelled MG 81Z machine gun and fitting additional cockpit armour.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Arrival of the Flagship Ju 88 A-4</i></b><br />
<br />
The Ju 88 A-4 went into service only during the closing days of the Battle of Britain. Although the A-4 was even slower than the A-1, it had ironed out nearly all of the problems of the A-1. The A-4 brought in additional improvements including more powerful engines.<br />
<br />
It was the arrival of the A-4 that signalled the maturing of the Ju 88 into one of the most versatile combat aircraft of the Second World War. It was eventually used successfully as a bomber, dive bomber, night fighter, torpedo bomber, reconnaissance aircraft, heavy fighter and even as a flying bomb in the closing stages of the War.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
</div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-89463585797166615422015-08-30T02:13:00.001-07:002015-08-30T02:13:46.012-07:00The Face of the Battle of Britain - Missing!<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRrxDRnRnwU1n3g2vgJgr6p5kGi38p9qcxh0bPPGhPRjcmbdKNXHc38ed2efGKZv1jfNJVGQY_1UVZ6Uia4xpCtEuolt0kIcMeYJ83KCVZCjs7Br_OlndY6jRyadSyQa_aQyZi5ww-KzA/s1600/GillmanFrontCover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRrxDRnRnwU1n3g2vgJgr6p5kGi38p9qcxh0bPPGhPRjcmbdKNXHc38ed2efGKZv1jfNJVGQY_1UVZ6Uia4xpCtEuolt0kIcMeYJ83KCVZCjs7Br_OlndY6jRyadSyQa_aQyZi5ww-KzA/s400/GillmanFrontCover.jpg" width="300" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Over the Summer of 1940 one face in particular appeared on the pages of many picture magazines and newspapers. It depicted perfectly the face of a fighter pilot: young, keen and dashing - and it continues to be the iconic face of a Battle of Britain fighter pilot.<br />
<br />
Sadly within weeks of this iconic photograph being taken, this young pilot was dead.<br />
<br />
He was only 19 and was shot down only a few miles from the town he grew up in.<br />
<br />
Despite his image being used extensively for articles, propaganda and recruitment, his identity was not released until long after the Battle. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>Perfect Portrait</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
It is easy to see how this image has stood the test of time and remained so iconic. It is difficult to imagine any photographer doing a better job.<br />
<br />
The camera height is low giving a heroic feel as the viewer looks up to him, it also puts what looks like clear blue Summer sky in the background.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
He is looking up at that sky as if looking out for the enemy.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
The shadows are high contrast and sharp-edged, which really makes it look like high Summer sun.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
The camera is shadow-side, making the face almost 3D as the light rakes across it. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
And the way the sun glints on the equipment, you can almost feel the texture of the sun-warmed leather.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
His face is beautifully framed by his equipment. Surely this is one of the finest portraits of a pilot from that era.<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
And then there's the pilot himself. He's young, dashing, cheerful and looking eager to get up into the Summer sky and do battle. But who was he?</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>Who Was He?</b><br />
<br />
In July 1940 a photographic unit from Fox Photos visited RAF Hawkinge and took some iconic pictures of pilots from 32 Squadron. One of them, of P/O Keith Gillman was to become the face of the Battle of Britain and was soon to appear everywhere.<br />
<br />
<b>19 Years Old</b><br />
<br />
Pilot Officer Keith Gillman was 19 years old and first flew with No 32 Squadron on 5 June 1940.<br />
<br />
For much of July and August 1940, 32 Squadron was operating out of Hawkinge and took the real brunt of the Luftwaffe onslaught.<br />
<br />
<b>Gillman's First Victories</b><br />
<br />
On 19 July 1940 twelve Hurricanes from 32 Squadron were involved in a big battle over Gillman's home town of Dover where he grew up. This from the Operations Record Book:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Dover area. At 19,000 feet a number of Ju87s observed bombing Dover. While evading AA fire, patrol was attacked by 12 Me109s and a dog-fight ensued. F/Sgt Turner was shot down in flames but baled out. Is now in hospital at Dover on danger list. Enemy aircraft were shot down by F/Lt Brothers (one Me 109), Sgt Henson (one Ju87), P/O Gillman (one Me109) S/Ldr Worral (one Me109 - unconfirmed).</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
In Gillman's own words on his Combat Report, this is how he "bagged" his first 109:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>I was flying No 2 in Yellow Section, which was the Squadron rear guard. Three ME 109s dived in front of the section to attack Red Section, and I followed No 2 of the enemy formation who dived gently to port, and fired three bursts of approximately 50 rounds per gun, part of the aircraft was shot away, and it dived vertically towards the sea. It was obviously out of control but I had no time to follow it down, as I was attacked by another ME 109.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
On 24 August 1940 he was involved in two big combats: at 20,000 feet over Dover when eleven of the squadron's Hurricanes were attacked by twelve Bf109s and shot down two for the loss of two of their own; and at 10,000 feet over Folkstone when ten Hurricanes took on fifteen Bf109s in the ensuing dogfight. No 32 Squadron's Operations Book recorded that Pilot Officer Gillman:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...attacked one which blew up and fell into the sea.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>Pilot Officer Gillman Missing!</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
The following day (25 August) nine Hurricanes went forward from Biggin Hill to Hawkinge at 0825 hours. After one four-aircraft scramble from there they returned to Biggin Hill at 1420 hours; then at 1655 hours eight Hurricanes (led by Squadron Leader M N Crossley) took off again for Hawkinge. At 1820 hours they were scrambled from there and, in the words of the Operations Record Book:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...ordered to patrol Dover. Twelve Do215s escorted by about 26 Me109s were intercepted at 14,000 feet south of Dover. S/Ldr Crossley shot down a Do215 in flames and sent an Me109 spinning into the sea. F/Lt Proctor shot down an Me109 in flames off Cap Gris Nez. P/O Rose was shot down and baled out landing in the sea but was rescued uninjured after 1 1/2 hours. P/O Gillman missing.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<i><br /></i>
<b>It wasn't just his Image that was Iconic</b><br />
<br />
Sadly it wasn't just young Keith's image that was iconic of the Battle of Britain...but also his fate. He'd only been with a front line squadron for a matter of weeks and had already shot down two enemy aircraft despite having less than glowing scores from his flight training only a few months earlier.<br />
<br />
Within only a few weeks of joining his Squadron his was killed. He was nineteen...the same age as a youngster of today might leave college to go to university or finish an apprenticeship.<br />
<br />
Sadly he was one of 449 fighter pilots who lost their lives defending the UK from widespread death and terror that would have resulted if Nazi Germany had succeeded in occupying mainland Britain.<br />
<i><br /></i>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Lest We Forget</i></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<i><br /></i></div>
</div>
</div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-66526432553532882132015-08-24T14:22:00.000-07:002015-08-26T00:43:40.917-07:00What If Germany had Invaded Britain<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></i></div>
<br />
The Battle of Britain was the huge air battle in the Summer in 1940 that was supposed to be the prelude to Germany's invasion of mainland Britain.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Pictures of Spitfires and dashing pilots and descriptions of the Battle of Britain as "the heroic struggle against Nazi tyranny" are so familiar that it is easy for them to lose their real meaning.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
During the Battle of Britain pilots were for sure fighting for their country but do many of us actually appreciate what would have happened to the UK population if Germany actually had invaded? </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>We should remain grateful to the bravery and sacrifice of The Few...and here's why!</i></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Nazi Germany had plans, detailed plans, as to what they would do with the UK had they invaded - and thank goodness it never happened.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Male Population Deportation</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
"The able-bodied male population between the ages of 17 and 45 will, unless the local situation calls for an exceptional ruling, be interned and dispatched to the Continent" according to captured documents. This represented about 25% of the male population. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The deported male population would have most likely been used as industrial slave labour in areas of the Reich such as the factories and mines of the Ruhr and Upper Silesia. Living and working conditions would have been severe.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Terrorism, Hostages & Immediate Death Penalties</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The remaining population was to be terrorised. Civilian hostages would be taken and the death penalty immediately imposed for even the most trivial acts of resistance.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Hitler had called the English lower classes "racially inferior". Presumably they may well have suffered similar treatment to that he had planned for the Russians, who the Nazis had regarded as sub-humans, fit only to be worked to death.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Plundering</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The UK was to be plundered for anything of financial, military, industrial or cultural value.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
"Aero-technological research...and important equipment" was to be secured as well as "Germanic works of art."</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
There was even a suggestion that Nelson's Column should be moved to Berlin.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Control over the Media</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Major news agencies would be closed and control taken of all newspapers. Anti-German newspapers were to be closed down.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Death Squads</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Death squads were to be tasked with liquidating Britain's Jewish population, some 300,000 in number.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>The Black Book</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
They were also to immediately arrest 2,820 people identified in a list, known as the Black Book. The list included British subjects and European exiles living in Britain.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Against each name was the Security Office to which the person was to be handed over. Churchill was to be placed in the custody of Foreign Military Intelligence but most people listed were to be placed in the custody of the Gestapo.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The list included politicians and their families, poets, writers, journalists, publishers, pacifists, trade unionists, diplomats, film producers, directors, actors and actresses.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Himmler's Intention</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Heinrich Himmler was one of the most powerful men in Nazi Germany and one of the people most directly responsible for the Holocaust. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
He is reported to have expressed his intention to kill about 80% of the populations of France and England by special forces of the SS after the German victory.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Chilling & Disturbing</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
It is chilling and disturbing to know what was planned for the UK population if Hitler's plan to invade Britain had been successful. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Only the Royal Air Force, the Royal Navy and the British Army stood in his way. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Britain and her Empire stood alone. All her allies had already fallen and were starting to be subjected to similar plans to those intended for the UK.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>"The Gratitude of Every Home in our Island..."</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
On 20 August 1940, whilst invasion of the UK was still in Hitler's plans, Churchill said that: </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"The gratitude of every home in our Island...goes out to the British airmen who, undaunted by odds, unwearied in their constant challenge and mortal danger, are turning the tide of the World War by their prowess and by their devotion." </i></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Knowing now what Hitler had planned if he'd been successful, Churchill was certainly right to fight on and had certainly not over-stated the levels of gratitude of the wartime generation</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>but every subsequent generation might do well to remember</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>how bravery, heroism and sacrifice of a Few </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>saved an entire population, an entire way of life, an entire country</i><i>...from oblivion.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Lest We Forget</i></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
</div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-20932703646180007242015-08-21T15:41:00.000-07:002015-08-21T15:45:16.239-07:00Some Squadrons had to be Replaced after a Week<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
Air Chief Marshal Sir Hugh Dowding was a big advocate of squadron rotation to give respite and time for training. The Luftwaffe on the other hand kept their units continuously in the front line.<br />
<br />
Even as far back as July 1915 after the Battle of the Somme, Dowding was a strong supporter of pilot rotation. When Dowding was commanding officer of No 16 Squadron, he clashed with General Trenchard, commander of the RFC, over the need to rest pilots exhausted by non-stop duty.<br />
<br />
<br />
Here's how squadron rotation worked during the Battle of Britain, in Dowding's own words:<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>A fresh squadron coming into an active Sector would generally bring with them sixteen aircraft and about twenty trained pilots. They would normally fight until they were no longer capable of putting more than nine aircraft into the air, and then they had to be relieved.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>This process occupied different periods according to the luck and skill of the unit. The normal period was a month to six weeks, but <u>some units had to be replaced after a week or ten days</u>.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>By the beginning of September, <u>the incidence of casualties became so serious that a fresh squadron would become depleted and exhausted before any of the resting and reforming squadrons was ready to take its place.</u></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Fighter pilots still could not be turned out by the training units in numbers sufficient to fill the widening gaps in the fighting ranks. Transfers were made from the Fleet Air Arm and from the Bomber and Coastal Commands, but these pilots naturally required a short flying course on Hurricanes and Spitfires and some instruction in formation flying, fighter tactics and interception procedure.</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
</div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-75734631247155450542015-08-21T13:37:00.000-07:002015-08-25T12:12:54.057-07:00Hugh Dowding, architect of the Battle of Britain<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Hugh Dowding won us the Battle of Britain </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Was he rewarded? </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>No! He was sacked!</i></div>
<br />
The Battle of Britain was never part of Germany's war plan. If it had of been they would have built a strategic bomber force but their intent was to subdue the UK into taking no part in hostilities.<br />
<br />
Hitler had assured Goering in 1938 that "War with England was quite out of the question". Even as late as August 1940 Hitler was hoping that the UK would sue for peace and forbad terror bombing of English cities.<br />
<br />
The Battle of Britain was not even in the fore-minds of many of those at the Air Ministry or high up in the Royal Air Force. In 1932 British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin declared that "The bomber will always get through" and many people in positions of authority agreed with him.<br />
<br />
There was a popular view that there was little point having a fighter defence system and that the only way to win an air war was to have sufficient bombers at your disposal so as to be able to deliver a "knock-out" blow to the enemy in response.<br />
<br />
Dowding disagreed with Baldwin and all his supporters. He could foresee an air war that Baldwin thought would never happen but an air war that we now call the Battle of Britain. <br />
<br />
Dowding was right. He confronted the political heavy-weights who advocated "the bomber will always get through" and won, but not without making political enemies.<br />
<br />
<b>The "Dowding System"</b><br />
<br />
In July 1936 Dowding was appointed commanding officer of the newly created RAF Fighter Command. The integrated air defence system he put together had the following elements:<br />
<br />
1. Radar (Dowding was one of the first to see its potential)<br />
2. Royal Observer Corps (who filled in the gaps of radar coverage)<br />
3. Raid Plotting<br />
4. Radio control of aircraft<br />
<br />
He ensured that the network was linked by dedicated telephone cables buried sufficiently deeply to provide protection against bombing. The network had its centre at a converted country house on the outskirts of London, RAF Bentley Priory.<br />
<br />
The system as a whole later became known as Ground Control Interception (GCI) but is still referred to as the "Dowding System."<br />
<br />
<b>Introduction of New Aircraft</b><br />
<br />
Dowding introduced modern aircraft into the service including the Spitfire and Hurricane. He was not a supporter of the Defiant, instead he felt that the best fighters were those that were forward firing and aimed by the pilot.<br />
<br />
He is credited with having taken on the Air Ministry and won to ensure that fighter aircraft were equipped with bullet proof wind shields.<br />
<br />
<b>Battle of Britain</b><br />
<br />
Dowding resisted repeated requests from Prime Minister Winston Churchill to weaken the home defence by sending precious squadrons to France before it fell.<br />
<br />
Yet again, Dowding had determined a carefully thought through path and faced-down political heavy-weights, but with political cost.<br />
<br />
During the Battle itself the Dowding System worked as a force-multiplier, getting much greater benefit from the small forces at his disposal.<br />
<br />
Dowding's major contribution during the Battle was to marshal resources behind the scenes including replacement aircraft and air crew. He left his subordinate commanders more or less a free hand to run the battle in detail.<br />
<br />
<b>Dowding's Downfall after Victory</b><br />
<br />
Dowding had foreseen the Battle of Britain, prepared for it, fought it and won it. At each of these stages he had carefully considered his options, chosen what turned out to be correct choices but in the process he made resentful political enemies.<br />
<br />
"The bomber will always get through" supporters thought money should be spent on building a stronger bomber force not wasted on his Fighter Command approach.<br />
<br />
During the Battle of Britain it became clear to all that Bomber Command was nowhere near strong enough to be capable of delivering the "knock-out blow" required to deter Germany from bombing England. As Dowding's Fighter Command approach was seen to be succeeding, resentment against him grew.<br />
<br />
Dowding's strategy of preserving his fighter reserve by using guerrilla tactics against large bomber formations as directed by his ground controllers proved highly successful. At the height of the Battle his approach was challenged strongly by 12 Group commander Leigh-Mallory and Acting Squadron Leader Douglas Bader. They strongly advocated the unwieldy and ineffective Big Wing approach of forming up three or more squadrons before engaging the enemy. As Keith Park pointed out, Big Wings were too slow to form up and usually in the wrong place.<br />
<br />
History gives us the hindsight of knowing that Dowding's choices were correct but political momentum seemed again to have been with his adversaries.<br />
<br />
As the RAF began to win the air war over England it was inevitable that the daylight skies would be cleared and German bombers would restrict their operations to night bombing. Dowding knew this would happen and also knew that the only answer to this lay in the development of Airborne Interception Radar. His efforts to bring AI radar into service had been frustrated by those around him but when the night Blitz of London started and AI radar wasn't ready, political pressure was applied to him.<br />
<br />
A committee of enquiry chaired by Sir John Salmond produced a long list of recommendations to improve night air defence. Dowding approved only a selection of Salmond's recommendations. Churchill and Lord Beaverbrook decided it was time for Dowding to step down.<br />
<br />
Personally I don't know what the recommendations were but it seems entirely in Dowding's character to have carefully considered all the options and only backed those he thought of value...and he may have been right...but those panicked by the politics caused by the dreadful bombings would have wanted to have seen every possible action taken.<br />
<br />
Dowding was unwillingly replaced in command in November 1940 by Big Wing advocate Sholto Douglas.<br />
<br />
<i>If you want to know more about how Dowding and his 11 Group commander Keith Park suffered politically after their victory of the Battle of Britain, you may like to read our blog about it: </i><br />
<i><a href="http://bofb1940.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/big-wing-or-assassins-bullet.html" target="_blank">Big Wing or Political Conspiracy</a></i><br />
<br />
<b>The Gratitude of Every Home in Our Island?</b><br />
<br />
It seems sad that it was Churchill's words about the gratitude of the whole nation going out to those who'd eventually win us that Battle of Britain, and that it was Churchill who sided with Dowding's political adversaries in his sacking.<br />
<br />
The lack of gratitude felt by Dowding when he was sacked by Churchill after he won the Battle of Britain must have been remarkably similar to that that Churchill wrote about after losing the 1945 General Election having won the War.<br />
<br />
<b>In the Words of His Pilots</b><br />
<br />
<i>Squadron Leader George Darley</i><br />
<br />
Dowding was too nice a chap and he came up against a gang of thugs. Leigh-Mallory was very jealous of him. He felt he wasn't getting enough of the limelight and he got a lot of backing in the Air Ministry.<br />
<br />
<i>Flight Lieutenant Francis Wilkinson</i><br />
<br />
It was entirely [Dowding's] foresight in being able to see where the strain was going to come, and to be able to take the measure of that strain, which allowed Fighter Command to bear the enormous, almost unbearable load that it had when the fighting came. <i>Stuffy</i> (the pilot's nickname for Dowding) had foreseen that our fighter squadrons were going to be depleted in strength. He had foreseen that Sector Operations Room would be bombed. And he'd made plans for the rapid interchange of squadrons between Scotland and Northern England and the South. If it hadn't been for his colossal foresight and meticulous planning right from the very beginning, we'd have had it.<br />
<br />
<i>Squadron Leader Sandy Johnstone</i><br />
<br />
After <i>Stuffy</i> was made to retire the war blew up into a global thing. Great names arose - Eisenhower, Montgomery, Alexander, Bradley. Great battles were won - Alamein, D-Day, the crossing of the Rhine. But they were all courtesy of <i>Stuffy</i> Dowding. None of these people would even have been heard of if <i>Stuffy</i> hadn't been there, if he hadn't won the Battle of Britain. His statue ought to be standing atop a plinth in Trafalgar Square.<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>My Personal Opinion</b><br />
<br />
Dowding was known for his humility and great sincerity and was widely considered by his pilots as a leader who cared for his men and had their best interests at heart.<br />
<br />
He often referred to his <i>"dear fighter boys"</i> as his <i>"chicks"</i>, in fact his son Derek was one of them.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Dowding seems to have been a thoughtful and clever man. A man who felt that the burden of command was to determine the best answer and fight for its implementation whatever the political cost.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>All politics can do is get you sacked...but being wrong can get people killed!</b></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Luckily for us he achieved great things, </i><br />
<i>things that we could easily look back on and say that "This was our Finest Hour"</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...sadly he suffered terribly at "man's ingratitude".</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<br />
The inscription at the foot of Dowding's statue outside St Clement Danes church on the Strand in London, is one of the finest tributes to him I have read and I share it with you: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;"><i>Air Chief Marshal Lord Dowding was commander-in-chief of Fighter Command, Royal Air Force, from its formation in 1936 until November 1940. </i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;"><i>He was thus responsible for the preparation for and the conduct of the Battle of Britain. With remarkable foresight, he ensured the equipment of his command with monoplane fighters, the Hurricane and the Spitfire. </i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;"><i>He was among the first to appreciate the vital importance of R.D.F. (radar) and an effective command and control system for his squadrons. </i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;"><i>They were ready when war came. </i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;"><i>In the preliminary stages of that war, he thoroughly trained his minimal forces and conserved them against strong political pressure to disperse and misuse them. </i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;"><i>His wise and prudent judgement and leadership helped to ensure victory against overwhelming odds and thus prevented the loss of the Battle of Britain and probably the whole war. </i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #252525; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;"><i>To him, the people of Britain and of the Free World owe largely the way of life and the liberties they enjoy today</i></span></div>
<br />
<br />
If you want to know more about how Dowding and his 11 Group commander Keith Park suffered politically after their victory of the Battle of Britain, you may like to read our blog about it:<br />
<a href="http://bofb1940.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/big-wing-or-assassins-bullet.html" target="_blank">Big Wing or Political Conspiracy</a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-29777745872525179462015-08-19T02:05:00.002-07:002015-08-21T08:00:23.658-07:00The Attack Dive of a Ju87 Stuka<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
The Junkers Ju87 Stuka dive-bomber was one of the most iconic German aircraft of the early part of the war. With its inverted gull-shaped wings, fixed undercarriage and distinctive spats over its wheels, visually there was nothing else like it.<br />
<br />
At first sight the Ju87 looks to be ungainly, unlikely and dated. Actually it was a thorough-bred and the work that Junkers put into its development was extraordinary. It was designed as a precision dive-bomber for close-air support for the German army and in this role it reigned supreme.<br />
<br />
The Ju87 was not only incredibly accurate but also truly terrifying. The troops being bombed by it knew they were the target because it was screaming and pointing at them. To augment the Ju87's well-known whistling, the crews attacked sirens, "Trumpets of Jericho", to the landing gear as an added psychological weapon (though this wasn't used much during the Battle of Britain). For troops defending a strong point, a Ju87 attack was truly a terrifying experience.<br />
<br />
The German air ministry had declared that all German bombers must be capable of dive bombing. This was because dive bombing was so much more accurate than level bombing and Germany was critically short of munitions.<br />
<br />
In the Ju87, Junkers developed a dive-bomber that was un-matched by anything else in the world. With its strengthened airframe and attack dive autopilot system, it could maintain control whilst accurately diving at 90 degrees onto its target at a constant speed of over 300mph.<br />
<br />
Here's an insight into the procedures the pilot went through during his attack dive:<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>The pilot approaches his target at between 13,000 and 15,000 feet and locates his target through a bombsight window in the cockpit floor.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>He sets the chosen altitude for bomb release and pullout </i><i>into the autopilot system</i><i> (usually at a minimum height of 1,500 feet) .</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>He moves the dive lever to the rear, limiting the "throw" of the control column.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>He opens the dive brakes, sets the trim tabs, retards his throttle and closes the coolant flaps.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The aircraft rolls 180 degrees onto its back and then noses into a dive.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Red tabs protrude from the upper surfaces of the wing as a visual indicator to the pilot that, in case of a g-induced black-out, the automatic dive recovery system would be activated.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The Stuka dived at an angle between 60-90 degrees, holding a constant speed due to dive brake deployment which increases the accuracy of the Ju87's aim.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The pilot would manually fine-tune the dive angle (often 90 degrees) by reference to the visual horizon out the side of his canopy.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>At about four seconds before the release altitude is reached, a horn in the cockpit would sounds. When the horn stops, a light on the contact altimeter comes on, the pilot releases the bomb and initiates the automatic pull-out mechanism by depressing a knob on the control column.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>An elongated U-shaped crutch located under the fuselage swings the bomb out of the way of the propeller and the aircraft automatically begins its 6g pullout causing the crew's sight to grey out. Once the nose was above the horizon, the dive brakes retract, the throttle opens and the propeller is set to climb.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The pilot regains control and resumes normal flight.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>He must reopen his coolant flaps quickly to prevent his engine from overheating.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>With the target area now behind the aircraft, the rear gunner would spray the area with machine gun fire, keeping the defenders' heads down to help ensure the success of the next Stuka dive bomber in line.</i><br />
<br />
The automatic pull-out was not liked by all pilots. Helmut Mahlke said that on his unit they disconnected the system because it allowed the enemy to predict the Ju87's recovery pattern and height, making it easier for ground defences to hit an aircraft.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
Ungainly? Yes! </div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Vulnerable to attacks but fast Spitfires and Hurricanes? Yes!</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
...but as an accurate and terrifying bombing system it was unmatched. </div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
In the Ju87 Stuka dive bomber, the German army must surely have had the most effective artillery in the world.</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Perfect for the prosecution of a lightning war, or <i>Blitzkrieg</i>!</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
</div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-71143483578339152652015-08-11T14:34:00.002-07:002015-08-21T08:02:12.681-07:00Spitfire Shot Down After Solo Attack on Twelve Bf109s<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
On 11 August 1940, Pilot Officer Stevenson from 74 Squadron (Spitfires) climbed to attack a Bf109. He thought the enemy must have thought he was another 109 but then he suddenly dive away. Stevenson followed and gave him a two second burst. He saw the 109 lurch slightly and then go into a vertical dive. Stevenson kept his height at 15,000 feet and watched as his victim dived straight into the sea fifteen miles south-east of Dover.<br />
<br />
Stevenson then climbed to 23,000 feet up-sun and saw a formation of twelve Bf109s which was 2,000 feet below him north of Dover. He started to dive down onto them from the out of the sun with the intention of spraying the whole formation from behind. Before he could engage them, there was a large amount of cannon and machine gun fire coming from behind him. A dozen Bf109s were diving at him from out of the sun and about half of them were shooting at him.<br />
<br />
He heard a popping noise and his control column became useless and his aircraft entered a vertical dive. He pulled his canopy hood back in order to bale out. He got his head out of the cockpit and the slipstream tore the rest of him out of his aircraft.<br />
<br />
He watched his Spitfire crash into the sea a mile off Deal. It took him twenty minutes to come down on his parachute and as he did so he had drifted eleven miles out to sea. After an hour and a half, an MTB boat came to look for him but in the heavy sea it couldn't find him. Stevenson fired shots from his revolver and kicked up foam in the water. The MTB saw him, picked him up and took him to Dover.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Pilot Officer Stevenson was awarded the DFC (gazetted 27 August 1940) and he was posted on 20 September 1940 to 5 OTU Aston Down as in instructor.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>He was killed on 13 February 1943 as a Flight Lieutenant with 64 Squadron shot down during a sweep over the Boulogne area in a Spitfire IX.</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-24829891749849913092015-08-10T14:07:00.002-07:002015-08-21T08:02:24.942-07:00"A War Against England is Quite Out of the Question", Hitler 1938<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
During the Summer of 1940, Germany came perilously close to winning the Battle of Britain by destroying RAF Fighter Command over Southern England and allowing Operation Sea Lion, the invasion of England, to begin.<br />
<br />
During the Spring of 1940, the Luftwaffe had been highly successful in the <i>tactical</i> close-air-support role of Germany's Blitzkrieg (lightning war) across Europe but it was it's <i>strategic</i> bombing role in the Blitz (bombing of British cities) from September 1940 onwards, that lost Germany the air war over England.<br />
<br />
Germany's pre-war thinking was very much that the Luftwaffe's primary role was as tactical close air support for the army. This proved most successful in Poland, Belgium and France.<br />
<br />
Ironically, if the Luftwaffe had remained in the <i>tactical</i> role of destroying Fighter Command airfields, it may well have won the Battle of Britain - it was only when it turned to <i>strategic</i> attacks on cities (for which the Luftwaffe had not designed) that the Battle started to turn in Britain's favour.<br />
<br />
<b>Tactical Good - Strategic Bad!</b><br />
<br />
Between the wars, the German military were working on the assumption that the prospects of <i>peace in Europe</i> after 1940 were doubtful. The Luftwaffe was therefore instructed to prepare for war with a target date of 1943.<br />
<br />
Germany's first consideration was for land wars with its European neighbours which led it to the conclusion that the Luftwaffe's primary role was to support the army.<br />
<br />
<b>Dive Bombers Good - Level Bombers Bad</b><br />
<br />
Severe shortages in munitions led it to an almost obsessive preference of dive-bombing over level bombing. Dive bombing was very much more accurate, which would considered or critical importance due to the desperate shortage of munitions available to Germany.<br />
<br />
The demand for bombs would be so great during the Polish campaign that for a while concrete bombs filled with shrapnel were produced to cover shortages.<br />
<br />
<b>Medium Bombers Good - Heavy Bombers Bad</b><br />
<br />
The severe shortages in petroleum products meant it could not run a heavy bomber force for strategic bombing. The proportion of resources that a heavy bomber capability would take from the Luftwaffe's petroleum products budget was considered to be much too big for the small benefit they thought they might get from it.<br />
<br />
Another reason a heavy bomber force was never developed was the lack of suitable engines to power a heavy bomber. This was partly due to the late start that German engineers had in designing high-performance engine types and partly due to the low octane fuels available to operate them.<br />
<br />
Germany entered the war using 87-89 octane fuels. In contrast, during the Battle of Britain, the British were using 100 octane rules supplied by the United States.<br />
<br />
German industry had designed some successful heavy bombers but the Luftwaffe would never get to use them.<br />
<br />
<b>Development of German Bomber Types</b><br />
<br />
Between the wars, Germany was rapidly building an air force and designing the aircraft that it should comprise of. From concept to production of a new aircraft type, it could take the best part of five years. This allowed for only two or three generations of aircraft before their target date of being ready for war by 1943. Between 1919 and 1929 the speed, range and bomb load of a typical bomber had more than doubled.<br />
<br />
In 1934 a medium bomber specification was issues and the Dornier Do17 and the Heinkel He111 were selected for further development but these would continue to have shortcomings which led to the development of the Junkers Ju88 "fast bomber".<br />
<br />
The original Ju88 had very impressive performance which was the spoilt by the German authority's insistence on it being modified to have a dive-bombing capability.<br />
<br />
<b>"A War Against England is Quite Out of the Question"</b><br />
<br />
Hitler told Georing in the Summer of 1938 that:<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"a war against England is quite out of the question!" </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">[The Luftwaffe War Diaries, Bekker 1968] </span></div>
<br />
It is this, together with shortages of munitions and petroleum products that sealed the fete of Germany's expensive heavy bombers. Emphasis would instead be put into larger numbers of the fast, light, twin-engined medium bombers which were accurate and ideal for close air support of land forces.<br />
<br />
Hitler hadn't expected a war with England and the Luftwaffe hadn't prepared for it. But had Germany produced a heavy bomber capability in time for use against England's cities as well as its airfields, the levels of destruction, and even the very outcome of the Battle of Britain itself, could well have been different.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-5917418236778118652015-08-06T17:05:00.000-07:002015-08-21T08:02:35.900-07:00The True Start Date of the Battle of Britain? ...and Convoy Peewit<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
The 8 August 1940 saw the first large scale sustained clashes between the RAF and the Luftwaffe and as such was initially considered to be the official start date of the Battle of Britain by the Air Ministry.<br />
<br />
In 1941 Dowding rejected the 8 August to be the start date and proposed it to be the 10 July 1940, which, in Britain, is the date accepted by most nowadays. In Germany, the start of the Battle of Britain was when they launched their Eagle Attack, their plan for the destruction of RAF Fighter Command.<br />
<br />
The action in the period from 10 July to 7 August was in many ways indistinguishable from post-Dunkirk harassing raids. For this reason, some still consider the 8 August to be the true start date of the Battle of Britain.<br />
<br />
On the days leading up to the 8 August 1940, Luftwaffe activity was fairly light. This was mainly due to the fact that there was little in the way of British shipping movements.<br />
<br />
The 8 August 1940 saw are a large convoy (with the RAF codename of Peewit) of more than twenty merchant ships attempting to go through the Straits of Dover and heading westwards.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>The 8 August 1940 saw the heaviest ever raids against a British convoy. </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Only 4 of original 20+ ships of Peewit convoy reached Swanage undamaged</i></div>
<br />
This was the first time for two weeks that a merchant convoy attempted passage through the English Channel.<br />
<br />
The convoy had assembled the previous night at Southend and passed through the Dover Straits during the hours of darkness, heading for Swanage in Dorset.<br />
<br />
Sadly the convoy was picked up by the German Freya radar. German torpedo boats were sent to attack at the convoy at dawn and afterwards some 300 Ju87s and 150 Bf109s were also sent to attack the convoy.<br />
<br />
41 Squadron (Spitfires), 64 Squadron from Kenley (Spitfires), 65 Squadron from Hornchurch (Spitfires) and 610 Squadron from Biggin Hill (Spitfires) were sent to the Channel to intercept.<br />
<br />
The torpedo boats had sunk three ships and damaged another three before light.<br />
<br />
The British fighters reached the enemy aircraft before they had engaged the convoy. During the air combat that followed, four Spitfires were shot down with three pilots killed, one bailed out. Two more Spitfires were damaged and forced to return to base and another crash-landed on the Kent coast.<br />
<br />
A Bf109 was shot down and the pilot killed, four others tried to make it back to base but crash-landed in Northern France. Another was severely damaged but made it back to base.<br />
<br />
Only one ship received damage from a single Ju87 that managed to get through.<br />
<br />
With the benefit of low cloud, the protection of the Royal Navy and RAF fighters, Convoy Peewit continued its journey westwards.<br />
<br />
Further down the coast the convoy ran into better weather and the convoy was attacked by 89 Ju87s and 70 Bf109s just off the Isle of Wight. The Ju87s caused severe damage to the convoy.<br />
<br />
Fighter Command scrambled 145 Squadron from Westhampnett/Tangmere (Hurricanes), 257 Squadron from Northolt (Hurricanes) and 609 Squadron from Middle Wallop (Hurricanes) to meet the attackers.<br />
<br />
By the time the RAF arrived the Ju87s were returning to their bases but intense combat ensued between the British fighters and the Bf109s.<br />
<br />
The Spitfires and Hurricanes were forced to fight the Bf109s, leaving Ju87s to attack the convoy unhindered.<br />
<br />
Damaged and burning ships bellowing black smoke were scattered over the Channel for miles.<br />
<br />
The RAF had lost 13 Hurricanes in defending Peewit, five others were damaged and one Spitfire was destroyed. 13 pilots were killed and 3 seriously wounded.<br />
<br />
Len Deighton in his book <i>Fighter (</i>1977) commented:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>The British sailors who died this day were the victims of two aspects of stupidity. Firstly, the coastal convoys, carrying domestic cargoes, were still being sent through the dangerous waters of the Channel (instead of the goods going by railway, as they did later). Secondly, the Admiralty, in spite of endless evidence, refused to allow for the fact that the Germans might have excellent radar.</i></div>
<br />
Whatever the shortcomings of the Admiralty, this was indeed a portent of the intense air fighting to come when massive formations of Luftwaffe and RAF aircraft would clash in the skies over the next few weeks.<br />
<br />
To some, it was the intense aerial combat over Convoy Peewit which heralded the start of the Battle of Britain proper, on 8 August 1940<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-39920004789115531012015-08-06T05:38:00.001-07:002015-08-21T08:02:46.134-07:00The Destruction of Fighter Command - in 4 Days?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
<b>Hitler's Directive for the Conduct of War Against England</b><br />
<br />
On 1 August 1940 Hitler issued his Directive No 17, For the Conduct of Air and Naval Warfare Against England. In summary it said:<br />
<br />
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>Employ all forces available to eliminate the British air force as soon as possible</li>
<li>Once temporary or local air superiority is achieved, operations will continue against ports</li>
<li>Air operations against hostile naval and merchant ships will be considered a secondary mission</li>
<li>The intensified air offensive will be conducted so that adequately strong air forces can be made available whenever required to support naval operations against favourable fleeting targets</li>
</ul>
<br />
<b>Eagle Attack</b><br />
<br />
On 2 August 1940 the Luftwaffe General Staff issued the plan for the destruction of the RAF, starting the campaign for the Battle of Britain. Their plan for Adlerangrif or "Eagle Attack" consisted of three phases:<br />
<br />
<i>Phase One</i><br />
<br />
First 5 days: attacks made a semicircle starting in the west and proceeding south and then east, within a 90 to 60 mile radius of London<br />
<br />
<i>Phase Two</i><br />
<br />
Next 3 days: radius from London reduced to between 60 and 30 miles<br />
<br />
<i>Phase Three</i><br />
<br />
Final 5 days: attacks concentrated within a 30 mile radius centred on London<br />
<br />
<br />
In addition to the task of defeating the RAF, the German Combined Staffs had issued a directive in July from Field Marshal Keitel stipulating:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"The German lack of command of the sea could be substituted by supremacy in the air"</i></div>
<br />
It was recognised that permanent air supremacy was impossible without the occupation by land forces because many of the British air bases and supporting factories were beyond the range that Luftwaffe bombers could operate with fighter escorts. But it was thought that temporary air supremacy over the invasion area would be possible. This was considered sufficient to allow Operation Sea Lion (the invasion of England) to proceed as planned.<br />
<br />
The Luftwaffe were confident in their believe that they could achieve:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"The destruction of RAF Fighter Command in the south, would take four days"</i></div>
<br />
Not all of the Luftwaffe leadership was the General Staff that Alderangrif was the correct approach. The two Luftlotten commanders, Sperrle and Kesselring, both felt that RAF Fighter Command should be decisively weakened through night attacks before beginning any significant daylight operations.<br />
<br />
These views were over-ruled by Goering who believed that Fighter Command had already been substantially weakened. Goering was slowly beginning to take more and more control of Luftwaffe operations.<br />
<br />
<b>PHASE ONE of Eagle Attack</b><br />
<br />
On 6 August 1940 Goering set 10 August as the start date for Eagle Attack but bad weather postponed it until 13 August. On the 13th marginal weather resulted in the cancellation of some missions and sporadic results from others. Instead of focussing on Fighter Command, target types were many and varied, including: Bomber Command airfields, Fighter Command airfields, Coastal Command stations, channel shipping, aircraft factories and at least nine manufacturing cities.<br />
<br />
There was little other objective other than to "test the British defences."<br />
<br />
Throughout Phase One, through to the 18 August, attacks were directed against Fighter Command but generally only limited damage was inflicted with most facilities back in service within hours.<br />
<br />
Despite having the objective to reduce the effectiveness of Fighter Command, only limited effort was directed against Fighter Command bases, facilities and command and control capabilities.<br />
<br />
<b>Goering's Reorganisation after Phase One</b><br />
<br />
The Luftwaffe believed it was sufficient to draw up the British fighters to kill them in the air and a German intelligence report on the 18 August suggested that it was working:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"Estimated that the British had lost 770 fighters in the period from 1st July to 16th August and that only 300 were still operational"</i></div>
<br />
In reality 214 British fighters had been destroyed, 71 damaged in combat and more than 600 were still operational.<br />
<br />
At the end of Phase One, Goering decided to withdraw Ju87s from the Battle because of their excessive losses and he needed to conserve them for support of invasion forces. Bf110s had suffered similarly high losses but Goering refused to withdraw them, instead he directed Bf109s to escort them as well as bombers.<br />
<br />
Despite the Bf109s accounting for the majority of RAF kills, Goering would persistently blame the Bf109 pilots for lack of aggression and this led to some senior fighter unit commanders being replaced.<br />
<br />
Goering also decided there was little value to making any further attacks of British radar installations.<br />
<br />
<b>PHASE TWO of Eagle Attack</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
Phase Two did not immediately follow the first phase because of reorganisation or additional fighter forces in the Pas de Calais and because of bad weather. After a five day delay the offensive resumed on 24 August. The Luftwaffe concentrated its attacks on Manston, Hornchurch and North Weald.<br />
<br />
New tactics were used by both sides. The Luftwaffe used fewer bombers and more fighters in their formations because of the continued reluctance of the British to do battle with the German fighters. Park had ordered his pilots to accept combat with German fighters only if Fighter Command sector airfields were threatened.<br />
<br />
For the duration of Phase Two, 24 August to 6 September, the RAF lost 273 fighters in combat plus 49 damaged. The Luftwaffe lost 308 fighters and bombers with 62 damaged.<br />
<br />
Six out of seven sector airfields were extensively damaged and the telecommunications links to and from the operations blocks had proved especially vulnerable.<br />
<br />
The German strategy of concentrating on attacking Fighter Command airfields was working, it was forcing the RAF fighters into combat. The higher concentration of fighters in German raids reduced the edge that Fighter Command had previously had.<br />
<br />
The Luftwaffe could afford to trade Bf109s one for one with Spitfires and Hurricanes.<br />
<br />
<b>Fighter Command was Facing Destruction by the end of Phase Two</b><br />
<br />
According to Dowding, "The rate of loss was so heavy that fresh squadrons became worn out before convalescing squadrons were ready to take their place."<br />
<br />
<i>Dwindling Reserves</i><br />
<br />
Between 8 August and 6 September, 657 British fighters had been lost. By using replacement aircraft from repairs and storage, Fighter Command had managed to keep frontline strength to about the same levels as were available at the end of July - until 1 September.<br />
<br />
Reserves had dwindled from 518 Spitfires and Hurricanes on 6 July to only 292 by 7 September.<br />
<br />
<i>Disappointing Production</i><br />
<br />
In the last week of August, only 91 Spitfires and Hurricanes were produced while losses reached 137 destroyed and 11 seriously damaged.<br />
<br />
<i>On the Verge of Destruction</i><br />
<br />
Fighter Command estimated that reserves would be exhausted in three weeks followed by the steady depletion of frontline squadrons. This would be accelerated if the Luftwaffe could successfully know out critical production facilities.<br />
<br />
<i>Critical Shortage of Pilots</i><br />
<br />
In Phase One of the campaign (8 to 18 August) the RAF lost 154 pilots (killed, seriously wounded or missing) but only 63 new fighter pilots had come through from the training schools.<br />
<br />
During August the combat strength of Fighter Command fell by almost a third from 1,434 to 1,023. The squadron average fell from 26 to 16 operational pilots.<br />
<br />
In July and August, roughly a quarter of the squadron leaders and a third of the flight leaders had been killed or removed from flying due to injuries.<br />
<br />
Experienced pilots made up less than half of Fighter Command's strength, the remainder having less than 20 hours flying time on fighters.<br />
<br />
Stress levels were high and it was not uncommon for pilots to fly three or four sorties a day.<br />
<br />
<b>Eagle Attack Nearly Worked</b><br />
<br />
The RAF was faced with the real possibility of withdrawing the depleted and exhausted 11 Group to bases north of London.<br />
<br />
Goering's Eagle Attack was close to success. The Luftwaffe had within its grasp the possibility of achieving air superiority over the landing grounds of Operation Sea Lion, the German invasion of England.<br />
<br />
<b>Luftwaffe's Change in Strategy</b><br />
<br />
From the Luftwaffe's point of view, losses were very heavy and they had failed to tempt the RAF up in sufficient numbers to allow the German fighters to deliver the decisive blow.<br />
<br />
The idea of attacking London was gaining traction by the end of August.<br />
<br />
The German High Command had set 15 September as the original date for the invasion but by the beginning of September it was delayed until 21 September because the Luftwaffe had not neutralised the threat from the British Navy and RAF to the invasion forces.<br />
<br />
On 3 September Goering told Kesselring and Sperrle that there was no chance of destroying the English fighters on the ground and the RAF's last reserves would have to be forced into the air.<br />
<br />
His idea was that if the British were heavily defending their airfields, then they would defend even more vigorously their capital. Since London was within the range of the Bf109, the Luftwaffe could more easily concentrate their fighter forces for the kill.<br />
<br />
Sperrle strongly disagreed with Goering's plan to attack London. He felt that the British forces were too strong and that they too could concentrate all the their fighters over London. He favoured continued attacks on the airfields.<br />
<br />
German intelligence reports suggested that British aircraft serviceability was as low as 100 at the end of August. In fact the operational strength stood at 672 on 23 August.<br />
<br />
Hitler had forbidden attacks on London but the British had launched several attacks on Berlin in response to an accidental bombing of parts of London on 24 August. Fearing for his own popularity, Hitler agreed on 31 August to reprisal attacks on London.<br />
<br />
<b>PHASE THREE of Eagle Attack</b><br />
<br />
On 7 September, Phase Three started with 650 bombers and over 1,000 attacking London docks by day. Substantial damage was inflicted on London but Fighter Command, from 7 September onwards, had been saved from defeat on the ground. However, it was still possible that the RAF could be defeated in the air above London.<br />
<br />
From 11 to 14 September, London was attack by two major attacks (200+ bombers) and two minor attacks by day as well as attacks every night. Additional day raids were also carried out on Southampton (twice), Portland, Brighton, Eastbourne, Canterbury, Great Yarmouth and Norwich presumably to soften up the defences of these cities in preparation for invasion. But instead, the Luftwaffe would almost certainly have been better targeting 11 Group airfields.<br />
<br />
Luftwaffe bombers losses were high and the bomber commanders were successful in getting Goering to order that the first role of the German fighters was to protect the bombers and not attack the enemy, but his stated objective was to draw up fighters so they could be destroyed. The whole purpose of attacking London in the first place would seem to have been lost.<br />
<br />
The respite experienced by RAF airfields allowed the first break in over ten days for the pilots of 11 Group. Fighter Command had been in a state of near exhaustion but a new vigour resulted and was to prove decisive in the air battles on 15 September, they day that is now celebrated as Battle of Britain Day.<br />
<br />
<b>The Decisive Day - 15 September 1940</b><br />
<br />
The Luftwaffe High Command fully expected the missions scheduled for 15 September to be the decisive blow. From Hitler down, the German leadership believed that Fighter Command had been broken in spirit and material. RAF resistance to attacks on 11 and 14 September had been slight (owing to errors in coordinating intercepts).<br />
<br />
Attacks against London on 15 September involved 300 bombers and 1,000 fighters with another raid of 30 against Portland and Southampton aircraft works.<br />
<br />
With the support of 12 Group, Fighter Command met the raid with 170 Spitfires and Hurricanes operating from bases close to London which were not under attack.<br />
<br />
Fighter Command downed 58 and damaged 25 German aircraft including 26 fighters lost and 8 damaged. Psychologically, the blow to the Luftwaffe was devastating.<br />
<br />
British superiority on the 15 September was most likely to have benefited from the proximity of their airfields to the Battle, the freshness of the crews, the fact the airfields had not been attacked for the two days previous and the fact there was no diversionary raid.<br />
<br />
German attacks continue in attempts to wear down the enemy but none with the strength launched on the 15 September.<br />
<br />
Despite their continuing attacks, the Luftwaffe saw no evidence that the RAF was getting weaker but was suffering terrible losses.<br />
<br />
Eventually raids would be restricted to the hours of darkness and Operation Sea Lion was indefinitely postponed. In the Spring of 1941, Hitler turned his attentions towards Russia and the Luftwaffe units that had been bombing England were re-deployed to the Eastern Front.<br />
<br />
<b>Britain can be grateful to more than just Churchill's Few</b><br />
<br />
Fighter Command, particularly Dowding and Park but also all the pilots and ground crew, had played their part well and were well deserved recipients of the "gratitude of every home in our Island."<br />
<br />
But Britain should also be grateful to some of those "in the abodes of the guilty" (as Churchill described the Germans):<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>had they attacked airfields by night prior to attacking them by day, </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>had they attacked the airfields for longer, </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>had they continued to attack Britain's radar installations, </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>had Goering allowed his fighters to engage the British fighters instead of protecting his bombers, </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>had Goering continued to attack airfields whilst he attacked London</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>had Hitler followed his instinct and prevented attacks on London </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>and focussed on air-supremacy over his landing grounds</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>then the Luftwaffe may have won the Battle of Britain and Hitler may have invaded England.</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-6398023873819207872015-08-02T13:37:00.002-07:002015-08-21T08:03:13.647-07:00British Radar: It's not what you've got - it's what you do with it!<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
British radar has widely been credited as being a major reason for the RAF being able prevent the Luftwaffe from gaining air superiority over the UK during the Battle of Britain.<br />
<br />
British radar could determine the distance and height of aircraft approaching the coast from 200 miles away and could even detect low flying aircraft from a distance of 100 miles away.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
This allowed RAF Controllers to have sufficient early warning to be able to scramble fighters and direct (vector) them to intercept raids without having to fly standing patrols, giving exhausted pilots much needed respite at the height of the battle.<br />
<br />
It is thought that the effectiveness of British radar largely neutralised the advantage that Germany should of had from its superiority in numbers making the Battle much more closely matched. Without radar the RAF would probably have been overwhelmed by the Luftwaffe and the Battle of Britain may well have been lost. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Why didn't the Luftwaffe knock out the British radar stations? </b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
It wasn't because radar was a military secret or because Germany couldn't work out what the strange masts were for. They knew exactly what they were and what they were capable of.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Germany actually had much better radar than Britain during the Battle of Britain. Their radar sets were smaller; easier to rotate, move and position; higher resolution and able to detect smaller targets.<br />
<br />
Whilst their Freya radar sets were better, they were of a more complex design and they only had 8 operational by the start of the war, leaving large gaps between covered areas.<br />
<br />
British radar was simpler and easier to make and by the start of the war there was a complete chain of radar stations looking out to sea all along the southern and eastern coasts (Chain Home or CH).<br />
<br />
Germany was successfully detecting RAF bomber raids in great detail with their radar but they were having big problems communicating any useful information in time to their intercepting fighters. They therefore assumed that the RAF would have the same problem so didn't see British radar as a high priority target.<br />
<br />
Curiously, whilst Germany was having problems getting radar data to fighters, they did seem to have some success in vectoring bombers onto shipping targets they'd detecting some 60 miles away.<br />
<br />
At the start of the Battle of Britain, Germany did try to attack British radar using two different methods: dive-bombing and jamming.<br />
<br />
Dive-bombing met with little success, primarily because the huge masts of open steel construction were quite resilient to bomb damage. A few of the radar stations were taken off line temporarily but only for few hours. It is perhaps worth considering what might have happened if Germany had realised their importance and been more persistent in their raids.<br />
<br />
Jamming only met with temporary success. In July 1940 a simple method of jamming was used by Germany but was easily defeated. In September 1940 a more elaborate method of jamming was used but this too was quickly defeated.<br />
<br />
<b>The Dowding System</b><br />
<br />
What was exceptional about the British radar, was not the radar itself but the command and control method developed before the war by Dowding and his commanders.<br />
<br />
British radar could only look out to sea, once the raid was over land, the radar was no help and plotting raids over land had to be done with the help of the Observer Corps.<br />
<br />
The UK was divided up into small areas, each with it's own designation and there would be an Observer Corps detachment responsible for each. Each detachment would be connected by telephone to the same filter rooms as the radar stations allowing a battle plan be updated,almost in real time so the commanders could decide how to respond.<br />
<br />
The UK had solved the problem of getting useful radar data to the intercepting fighters!<br />
<br />
It also had radar stations that were resilient to bombing, a design that was simple and quick to construct, a radar coverage that was complete with no holes, a backup system with the Observer Corps and a radar design that was capable of being quickly modified to counter jamming.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Britain didn't have the best radar - but it did know what to do with it!</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-88250498938020852892015-07-31T16:38:00.001-07:002015-08-21T08:03:24.440-07:00Understanding Luftwaffe Unit Designations<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
To the untrained eye, the composition of the Luftwaffe can seem complex and hard to grasp. With designations such as StabII/StG2 and 3/JG27, it's easy to get befuddled, but once you get into the logic behind these names, it's really not that confusing.<br />
<br />
At the time of the Battle of Britain, the Luftwaffe was split into 7 Luftflotten (Air Fleets). Luftflotten were created according to a geographical area, and as new territories were invaded, new Luftflotten were created.<br />
<br />
Although Luftflotten could be moved to a new area, whilst in one place that Luftflotte had absolute control over all aspects of aviation in the region, including ground operations.<br />
<br />
Each Luftflotte was also allocated 25 Geschwader (Wings). Luftflotte 1 would have Wings 1-25, Luftflotte 2 would have 26-50 etc.<br />
<br />
Each Lutflotte was then divided into one of more Fliegerkorps (Air Corps), depending on the size and manner of the operations being undertaken. At the time of the Battle of Britain, 13 Fliegerkorps were in operation.<br />
<br />
Similar to Luftflotten, the Fliegerkorps had their own areas of operations, and were responsible for all operational matters such as maintenance, ordnance and deployment. However, they depended on the parent Luftflotte for administration and supply purposes.<br />
<br />
Each Fliegerkorps consists of several Geschwader (Wings) along with Reconnaissance Gruppen (Groups).<br />
<br />
Geschwader are specialised to a certain operational duty, be it a fighter wing or a bomber wing. The others include dive-bombers, night fighters, gliders, transport and ground attack wings.<br />
<br />
The designations of the different Geschwader are as follows:<br />
<br />
Fighter Wing --- Jagdgeschwader (JG)<br />
Night Fighter Wing --- Nachtjagdgeschwader (NJG)<br />
Heavy Fighter Wing --- Zerstörergeschwader (ZG)<br />
Bomber Wing --- Kampfgeschwader (KG)<br />
Dive-Bomber Wing --- Sturzkampfgeschwader (StG)<br />
Fast Bomber Wing --- Schnellkampfgeschwader (SKG)<br />
Transport Wing --- Transportgeschwader (TG)<br />
Ground Attack Wing --- Schlactgeschwader (SchlG)<br />
Glider Wing --- Luftlandgeschwader (LLG)<br />
Advanced Training Wing --- Lehrgeschwader (LG)<br />
<br />
As there were more than one of each type of Wing, an Arabic numeral would be placed after the abbreviation to distinguish between them. For example, the 27th Jagdgeschwader would be written as JG27<br />
<br />
Each different Geschwader is then divided into 3 Gruppen (Groups), although sometimes a 4th or even a 5th were added to bolster the strength of the Geschwader.<br />
<br />
The Gruppen within each Geschwader were ordered consecutiveley with Roman numerals. Therefore, the 4th group of the 27th Jagdgeschwader would be written as IV/JG27.<br />
<br />
Each Gruppen then contained 3 or 4 Staffeln (Squadrons). The Staffeln were numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals within their Geschwader, regardless of the Gruppe they belonged to. For example, the Staffeln of Gruppe I would be numbered 1, 2 and 3, but the Staffeln of Gruppe II would be numbered 4, 5 and 6.<br />
<br />
The designations of Staffeln were similar to that of the Gruppen, but with Arabic numerals instead of Roman ones. The 3rd Staffel of Gruppe II of Jagdgeschwader 27 would be written as 6/JG27. Note that it's a 6 instead of a 3, as it's a part of the 2nd Gruppe.<br />
<br />
Sometimes, designations will be written like StabJG27, or StabIV/JG27. The 'Stab' means 'Staff', and shows that that flight consists of aircrew and aircraft from the HQ staff, normally involving the Group/Wing Leader.<br />
<br />
Each Group and Wing contains a single Staff flight (StabSchwarm) consisting of 4 aircraft (including the Group/Wing Leader).<br />
<br />
A single Staffel contains on average 12 planes, although this can vary from 5 or 6 up to 16, depending on losses and reinforcements.<br />
<br />
In a Fighter Wing, each Staffel is divided into 3 Schwarms (Flights) of 4 aircraft each. A Fighter Schwarm was then divided into 2 Rotten (Singular - Rotte, literally meaning 'Gang') of 2 aircraft each. A Rotte was the basic fighting unit, consisting of a Leader and a Wingman.<br />
<br />
In a Bomber Wing, however, the Staffel is divided into 2 Schwarms of 6 aircraft each. Each Schwarm was then split into 2 Ketten (Singular - Kette, meaning 'Chain') of 3 aircraft each. The Kette was the standard bomber formation, and consisted of the 3 planes forming a V-shaped formation.<br />
<br />
Examples:<br />
<br />
9/KG76 --- 9th Squadron of the 76th Bomber Wing<br />
<br />
3/StG77 --- 3rd Squadron of the 77th Dive-Bomber Wing<br />
<br />
III/JG53 --- 3rd Group of the 53rd Fighter Wing<br />
<br />
StabIII/KG2 --- Staff Flight of the 3rd Group of the 2nd Bomber Wing<br />
<br />
So, just to recap, on average there are 12 aircraft in a Staffel, 3-5 Staffeln in a Gruppe, 3-5 Gruppen in a Geschwader, 25 Geschwader in a Luftflotte (spread out between several Fliegerkorps), and 7 Luftflotten in the entire Luftwaffe.<br />
<br />
I hope this helps<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Kit Dunster</div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06127405349078449727noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-70345303250942392772015-07-31T13:49:00.001-07:002015-08-21T08:03:49.487-07:00What was the Battle of Britain? ...and who were The Few?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
The American journalist Ralph Ingersoll thought that:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>The Battle of Britain was important in history as Waterloo or Gettysburg</i></div>
<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>What was the Battle of Britain?</b><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...maybe the answer depends on who you ask!</i></div>
<br />
Answer 1: <b>No Idea!</b><br />
<br />
According to the results of a survey carried out by the RAF Benevolent Fund for the 75th Anniversary of the Battle of Britain (published by The Telegraph on 10 July 2015), of 1,000 people asked:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>40% of today's young people have no idea of what the Battle of Britain is</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Only half of all adults knew that The Few is a reference to those who fought in the Battle of Britain</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>One in ten 18-24 year olds thought the Battle of Britain took place last year</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>The same number thought the Battle of Britain referred to a Viking attack</i></div>
<br />
Answer 2: <b>Spitfires and Dashing Pilots</b><br />
<br />
Spitfires look fantastic nowadays, they must have looked even more so during the 1940s when the previous frontline fighters were bi-planes. Some of the pilots were young, rich, well educated, drove fast sports cars and looked very dashing.<br />
<br />
At a time when public morale was everything and large numbers of RAF aircraft were flying over the Home Counties, it would have made great sense to have publicised these dashing pilots on posters and in films.<br />
<br />
In actuality, pilots came from all backgrounds and all parts of the Empire and a great number of them were not even officers.<br />
<br />
Whilst the Spitfire is still one of the prettiest aircraft ever made, there were actually more Hurricanes than Spitfires during the Battle of Britain and they shot down more enemy aircraft.<br />
<br />
<br />
Answer 3: <b>The Greatest Air Battle Ever Fought</b><br />
<br />
Germany had some 2,500 aircraft ranged against the UK. The RAF had some 600+ fighters. There was no doubt that the people who witnessed the Battle of Britain must have been in awe of the numbers involved.<br />
<br />
The noise, the destructive power, the sight of hundreds of aircraft, wave after wave...something that may never be seen again.<br />
<br />
Answer 4: <b>When Britain Fought Alone against the Might of an Undefeated Nazi Germany</b><br />
<br />
As "under-dog" stories go, the Battle of Britain has surely got to be up there with the best. Germany was huge and its industrial might was immense. Then after the fall of France, Germany had most of Continental Europe under its command.<br />
<br />
Since the fall of France, Germany could launch air attacks and an invasion from anywhere along the East Coast but also anywhere along our South Coast too.<br />
<br />
The Luftwaffe had more aircraft than the RAF, it had more experience, better tactics and arguably better equipment.<br />
<br />
Answer 5: <b>When Britain Turned the Tide of the War Against Germany</b><br />
<br />
When war was declared on 3 September 1939, fear and anxiety seared through every family in the Realm.<br />
<br />
The hideous violence of the Great War (as it was known then, only later to be known as the First World War), the War to End All Wars, was still fresh in living memory.<br />
<br />
So many families had lost fathers, brothers and sons - gassed, machine-gunned, blow apart or drowned. Many of those that survived had missing limbs and many more had psychological damage. Almost every family had been affected or knew one that was.<br />
<br />
It is these memories and images that went through the minds of families when they heard Neville Chamberlain declare war on the radio 3 September 1939.<br />
<br />
Terrible though the First World War was, the next war was feared to be even worse. Air warfare technology had transformed. Modern aircraft could go higher, faster, further and carry bomb loads of unspeakable destructive power.<br />
<br />
There was a feeling that "the bomber would always get through" and that they would not just drop high explosives but incendiaries and, the most feared of all, gas!<br />
<br />
The entire population was issued with gas masks. It was an offence to be in public without carrying your gas mask.<br />
<br />
By July 1940, UK families had lost 100,000 of their fathers, brothers and sons in the fall of France. Another 200,000 had only just made it home by the skin of their teeth and with the determination of the Royal Navy and it's fleet of Little Ships. They had lost their children, sent to the countryside to avoid the horrors of aerial bombing. The sea shores were off limits and covered in minefields and barbed wire. Local recreation grounds were now the homes of barrage balloons, search lights and anti-aircraft guns. Long cherished gardens had been dug up to plant vegetables and bury bomb shelters. Almost everybody, it seemed, was wearing military uniform or had become part of the war effort in civilian life as air raid wardens, fire watchers, working on farms or in factories or in hospitals or raising money.<br />
<br />
The whole of Continental Europe had fallen to Nazi Germany in weeks. Two of the greatest armies in the world (of France and Britain) had been brushed aside with heavy losses. German forces were only a few short miles across the Channel. To the entire world, it seemed that England was next.<br />
<br />
Refugees from Belgium and Occupied Europe had made it across the Channel with horrific stories of torture and summary executions. There could be little doubt in the minds of the ordinary British public that if Germany succeeded in invading the UK that political elites, academics, engineers and anybody in a leadership position would be imprisoned, deported or executed.<br />
<br />
Can it be any wonder that when the new Prime Minister Winston Churchill with his rousing speeches in June about never surrendering that it captured the hearts and minds of the entire population.<br />
<br />
The Home Fleet of the Royal Navy were given the job of destroying any invasion fleet that headed for UK shores. The Royal Navy was a formidable fighting force and one that is widely thought to have been our saviour should Hitler have actually attempted an invasion... but they were far out to sea and away from the public gaze.<br />
<br />
The Royal Air Force on the other hand were flying frequently over homes, factories and farms going out to meet the enemy. With the roar of their Merlin engines and disciplined formations they must have been an exciting and encouraging sight for the desperate eyes of a frightened public.<br />
<br />
The public could see swirling vapour trails as "our boys" engaged the enemy. Sometimes they'd see enemy aircraft shot down or even crash-land close by. It was a visible and tangible sight that gave weight to Churchill's assertion that: "we will never surrender."<br />
<br />
I don't think Churchill can have over-stated it when he said that:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"....the gratitude of every home in our Island...goes out to the airmen who...are turning the tide of the war."</i></div>
<br />
The reality is that the British Army and Royal Navy were every bit as involved in the prevention of the much feared invasion as the Royal Air Force was...but the RAF were always present, above the homes of the anxious...and they were winning...despite being dreadfully out-numbered and suffering dreadful losses.<br />
<br />
...and for that, every home in the Island I am sure would have been immeasurably grateful...I know I would have been.<br />
<br />
Answer 6: <b>The gratitude of so many...to so few</b><br />
<br />
Only weeks before the Battle of Britain, an army of some 300,000 British troops had been defeated in France...yet over the Summer of 1940...when everybody feared imminent invasion...only 3,000 young pilots were visibly "turning the tide of the war".<br />
<br />
Numerically the pilots of the RAF were 1% of the number of men in the British Expeditionary Force that were driven out of France.<br />
<br />
In my mind I can see how strongly Churchill's words would have resonated in the hearts of a grateful and relieved public when he said:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"Never in the field of human conflict, was so much owed, by so many, to so few"</i></div>
<br />
Answer 7: <b>Their Finest Hour</b><br />
<br />
And what of Churchill's impassioned hope that:<br />
<br />
<i>"If the British Empire [were] to last a thousand years, men would still say, this was their finest hour."</i><br />
<br />
The Battle of Britain is just about still within living memory, it was only 75 years ago<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...and apparently half the population of the country that were saved from tyranny...have already forgotten The Few that saved them.</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>If our country did last a thousand years, and if the Battle of Britain did turn out to indeed have been its "finest hour" </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>how ungrateful would it have been to have forgotten it entirely</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Please, don't let the importance of the Battle of Britain die. It's not taught in schools, there are precious few films, plays or games of it and major book stores allocate very little shelf space to it.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Raise the profile of the Battle of Britain in any way you can and show your gratitude to The Few</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...and everybody else who fought and lived through this extraordinary part of our history.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Thank you</i></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
</div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-86749010923057033152015-07-24T12:51:00.001-07:002015-08-21T08:04:22.229-07:00Who Had The Best Guns?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<b><br /></b>
<b>British .303" (7.7mm) Browning guns:</b><br />
<br />
8 machine guns mounted in wings (outside the propeller disk)<br />
20 rounds per second per gun (160 rounds per second overall)<br />
11.3 gram bullets fired at 740 m/s (2,430 fps)<br />
16 seconds worth of ammunition<br />
<br />
<b>Bf109s MG 17s (7.9mm) machine guns:</b><br />
<br />
2 machine guns mounted in the engine cowling (synchronised to shoot through the propeller disk)<br />
17 rounds per second per gun (slower because of sync with propeller)<br />
Slightly more destructive than the .303s (bullet mass and muzzle velocity varied)<br />
1 minutes worth of ammunition<br />
<br />
<b>Bf109E-4 20mm MG-FFM cannon:</b><br />
<br />
2 mounted in wings<br />
9 rounds per second per cannon (18 rounds per second overall)<br />
92 gram <i>explosive projectiles</i> fired at 700 m/s<br />
Less than 7 seconds worth of ammunition<br />
<br />
<b>Comparison</b><br />
<br />
Spitfires and Hurricanes had 8x .303" Browning machine guns mounted in the wings where as the Bf109 had 2x machine guns mounted in the engine cowling shooting through the propeller disk.<br />
<br />
The Bf109 machine guns could not fire as quickly as the Browning machine guns because they had to synchronise with the propeller.<br />
<br />
The British fighters had to have their guns adjusted so they harmonised at a single point at a predetermined distance from the aircraft (360m at the start of the Battle and reduced to 225m due to battle experience). This meant they were only at their most destructive at this single distance. The Bf109 machine guns were effective over a much broader ranger because they were so close to the centre-line of the aircraft.<br />
<br />
The Bf109 machine guns were slightly more destructive than the British Brownings but could carry nearly a minute's worth of ammunition rather than the 16 seconds carried by a Spitfire.<br />
<br />
The Bf109E-4 cannon, with its explosive projectile, was much more destructive than the Brownings but had a much slower firing rate (9 rounds per second instead of the Brownings' 20 rounds per second) and only had 7 seconds worth of ammunition on board.<br />
<br />
The Bf109E-4 cannon had a long flight time and curved trajectory (due to its low muzzle velocity) which made it difficult to hit targets at distance. It was quite a challenge for the German pilots because the flight times and trajectory curves of the cannon and machine guns were different requiring different mental calculations during combat.<br />
<br />
<b>How Did This Play Out In Combat?</b><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>It was much easier for a Spitfire or Hurricane to hit something with its eight fast firing Brownings than it was for a Bf109 with its slow, difficult to aim cannon with only 7 seconds of ammunition. </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>but...</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>if a Bf109E-4 hit its target could cause an immense amount of damage.</i></div>
<br />
Many a German aircraft would be riddled with .303 bullet holes but still return to base.<br />
<br />
The RAF committed to fitting its Spitfires and Hurricanes with .303 machine guns well before WW2 when aircraft were slower and less well armoured. By the time of the Battle of Britain the RAF knew they needed much more powerful armaments. They tried to hurry in the fitting of 20mm Hispano cannons but they weren't reliable until after the Battle had ended.<br />
<br />
<b>So Which Guns Were Best?</b><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Lesser pilots would find it easier to hit their target flying a British fighter than a Bf109</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Better pilots would find it easier to bring down their target flying a Bf109</i></div>
<br />
Whilst the guns would seem to have been better in the German aircraft, perhaps fortune favoured the British solution in a battle of attrition where, as time went on, experienced pilots were shot down and replaced with less experienced pilots.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-27953997677390239712015-07-23T16:57:00.001-07:002015-08-21T08:04:43.295-07:00The New Tactics that Devastated Convoy CW.8 on 25 July 1940<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
On 25 July 1940 the Luftwaffe took advantage of improved weather to attack a twenty-one ship convoy as it made its way through the Straits of Dover but they did so with devastatingly effective new tactics.<br />
<br />
Of the 21 ships in the convoy only 10 reached their destination of Portland, 11 ships were sunk or seriously disabled during the attack. Two Royal Naval destroyers sent to help were also put out of action and had to be towed back to Dover.<br />
<br />
This was the first time that Germany attacked a convoy from land, sea and air. They fired on the convoy with its big guns around Cap Gris Nez, they attacked it using high-speed German naval S-boats and bombed it from the air using wave after wave of Ju87 Stuka dive-bombers. The effect was devastating and the attack lasted from 11:30am to 7:30pm.<br />
<br />
In the morning Convoy CW.8 (Convoy Westward) was attacked by a wave of Ju87s, 50 Bf109s, fast S-boats and was fired upon from the French shore.<br />
<br />
The escorting Bf109s came in at sea level to be met by Spitfires of 65 Squadron (Hornchurch) while the Ju87s came out of the sky to dive bomb the convoy.<br />
<br />
No 32 Squadron Hurricanes (Biggin Hill) and 615 Squadron Hurricanes (Kenley) came to assist the sea level dogfight with the fifty Bf109s.<br />
<br />
No 54 Squadron Spitfires (Rochford) answered the call for assistance from the escorting naval vessels and engaged Bf109s that had arrived to assist the Ju87s. No 54 Squadron was to suffer badly but with one Spitfire to every five Bf109s it was a wonder that they only lost three aircraft.<br />
<br />
Further waves of attacking aircraft continued through out the afternoon.<br />
<br />
The Royal Naval destroyers Boreas and Brilliant were sent out from Dover to repulse the German motor torpedo boats attacking the convoy. Pursuing the S-boats away from the convoy and towards Calais, the destroyers were attacked themselves by German bombers.<br />
<br />
Ju87s badly damaged Boreas with two hits on her bridge, 17 crew were killed and 5 died of their wounds.<br />
<br />
Brilliant was also bombed, receiving two hits in the stern. Her tiller flat was flooded and boiler room fan support cracked but there were no casualties.<br />
<br />
Both destroyers were towed back into Dover by tugs. Brilliant's repairs wouldn't be completed until September 1940 and Boreas wasn't repaired until January 1941.<br />
<br />
25 July 1940 was undoubtedly a bad day for the RAF, the Royal Navy and the Merchant Navy.<br />
<br />
The losses were so great that it was decided to only move convoys through the English Channel after darkness and the Admiralty moved their RN ships out of Dover and put them in the relative safety of Portsmouth. Merchant ships would take on gunners in order to offer some defence and escorts would be provided in the future.<br />
<br />
The day undoubtedly belonged to Germany and its effective new tactics but Britain was learning and adapting - a pattern that would repeat itself many times throughout the Summer.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-54533396784042780442015-07-22T13:48:00.000-07:002015-09-07T04:15:51.721-07:00Big Wing or Political Conspiracy?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
The term "Big Wing" refers to the aerial combat tactic of having several squadrons in a single formation and was contraversially adopted during the Battle of Britain by 12 Group commander Air Vice-Marshal Trafford Leigh-Mallory and Acting Squadron Leader Douglas Bader.<br />
<br />
Initially the Duxford Wing (as it became known) had comprised 242, 310 and 19 Squadrons but later 302 and 611 Squadrons were also added.<br />
<br />
It was thought larger formations (Big Wings) would facilitate the shooting down of higher numbers of enemy aircraft and incur fewer losses than using smaller formations. Sadly large formations were slow to deploy, difficult to manage in the air and chaotic in battle.<br />
<br />
Leigh-Mallory and Bader of 12 Group felt there were huge advantages in having large formations to attack the enemy.<br />
<br />
Dowding (commanding officer of Fighter Command) and Park (commander of 11 Group) strongly felt the opposite. Park had tried using Wings in the defence of the Dunkirk beaches and found them to be unwieldy, chaotic and often in the wrong place.<br />
<br />
<b>History has sided strongly with Dowding and Park</b><br />
<br />
The Park approach of sending up single squadrons one after another to harass enemy formations on the way to their target was highly successful at protecting targets from the worst excesses of the raid and in the shooting down of enemy aircraft. Sadly it was costly and the tactic was not popular with some of his pilots because of the large losses.<br />
<br />
This guerrilla approach to aerial combat was exactly right for the war Park had to fight but it made huge demands on the pilots' bravery and skill...nevertheless it protected targets and shot down enemy aircraft.<br />
<br />
The Big Wing by comparison rarely engaged with the enemy (prior to the Luftwaffe raids on London) because it took too long to form up, was often in the wrong place, was unwieldy if it did engage and the increased chaos during combat resulted in much over-claiming of their successes. The Big Wing's actual successes turned out to be a fraction of what was claimed.<br />
<br />
The supporters of the Big Wing would point out its high claims and low losses. Even at the time, the claims were thought to have been exaggerated and their low loss rate was accountable to the fact they had rarely engaged with the enemy.<br />
<br />
<b>So the Big Wing was an utter failure? Perhaps not...</b><br />
<br />
History's assessment of the Big Wing's performance has been to assume its somewhat haphazard formation was solely intended to destroy enemy aircraft and protect intended targets...a purpose it was patently unsuited for according to the historic record.<br />
<br />
But perhaps its purpose was not just to attack the Luftwaffe...it would seem that the Big Wing was an effective political device for use against Dowding.<br />
<br />
Hugh Trenchard (founder of the RAF) had apparently clashed with Dowding when they were both commanders in the Royal Flying Corps during WW1.<br />
<br />
Trenchard had retired by the time WW2 had started but was still influential at the highest levels of the RAF and Air Ministry.<br />
<br />
Trenchard and his supporters felt that "the bomber would always get through" and that the only effective means of defending against bombing raids was to deliver a "knock out blow" by sending our own bombers back in response.<br />
<br />
There was a strong feeling by some that Fighter Command was the wrong approach when it came to defence against bombers. Fortunately, Dowding managed to get enough political support to put together Fighter Command and its Dowding System of Command and Control...but Dowding was unpopular in powerful places.<br />
<br />
When it became clear that Bomber Command was incapable of delivering a "knock out blow" to Germany in 1940 the pro-bomber advocates were severely embarrassed by Fighter Command's successes.<br />
<br />
<b>Was the Big Wing fiasco used by Dowding's political enemies to help bring him down?</b><br />
<br />
The Duxford Big Wing was formed after only a telephone discussion between Leigh-Mallory and Bader with little planning and with no discussion or agreement with Fighter Command. Bader had great enthusiasm for a Big Wing and Leigh-Mallory took him at his word.<br />
<br />
Is it dubious, or reckless, or negligent that a senior commander should take the word of an inexperienced junior officer and unilaterally commit to such a poorly executed experiment at such a critical time? And why did he put one of his least experienced Squadron Leaders in charge of such a difficult-to-lead unit?<br />
<br />
Bader did not always follow ground control instructions and often flew into 11 Group's area on his own initiative leaving Fighter Command unable to use the Big Wing in any coordinated way and many times it was caught out of position and unable to do good.<br />
<br />
Ironically Leigh-Mallory complained to Park during the Battle (according to McInstry), "Full explanation required why 11 Group fighters have shot down enemy fighters over 12 Group area."<br />
<br />
At a meeting of the Air Council on 17 October 1940, Dowding and Park found themselves on the defensive. Park started to monitor the effectiveness of Leigh-Mallory's big wings and submitted a report which showed that in ten separate sorties in the second half of October they had managed to shoot down just one German aircraft. But nobody was interested. It would seem that political interests, not military evidence, was guiding those at the highest levels.<br />
<br />
Despite having won the Battle of Britain, Dowding retired from his post in November 1940 and Keith Park was removed as commander of 11 Group and sent to Training Command. Park was replaced by Leigh-Mallory who brought his Big Wing ideas south. Leigh-Mallory would seem to have had sympathies in high places for his opinions and actions.<br />
<br />
Dowding's career was over but Park would eventually be given commands as befitting his talents: Malta, Sicily and North Africa.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br />
<i>The Big Wing may not have played an important tactical role in Battle of Britain</i><br />
<i>...but it played a crucial role in the outcome of the political conspiracy against Dowding</i><br />
<br /></div>
When the Air Ministry's Historical Branch first published its account of the Battle of Britain, there was no mention of Hugh Dowding or Keith Park. It was only at Churchill's insistence that they were eventually included.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
In a letter Park wrote at the time (McInstry), "Frankly I was more worried about the lack of cooperation (with Leigh-Mallory) than I was about out-witting the massed German raids."<br />
<br />
Once Leigh-Mallory was in post at 11 Group in January 1941, a paper exercise was carried out to explore the effectiveness of a Big Wing within 11 Group. The intention was to prove the superiority of large formations using the circumstances of an actual attack on Kenley, Biggin Hill and Hornchurch sectors on 6 September 1940.<br />
<br />
Leigh-Mallory mis-managed the operation, permitting the raid to progress unhindered which resulted in Kenley and Biggin Hill aerodromes being "bombed" whilst their aircraft were still on the ground.<br />
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="text-align: left;"><i>We should perhaps be grateful that Leigh-Mallory wasn't successful in becoming 11 Group commander any sooner, the Battle of Britain may well have had a different outcome</i></span></div>
</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-67203966963014969442015-07-21T05:42:00.000-07:002015-08-21T08:05:26.269-07:00We Found my Dad's old Hurricane - in the Science Museum<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>My Dad, Edgar Dunster, was ground crew for 615 Squadron at RAF Kenley during the Battle of Britain. </i></div>
<br />
During the mid to late 1970s we were on a family holiday and visited Torbary Aircraft Museum. My Dad froze and became very emotional, pointing at a Hawker Hurricane and said, "That's my aircraft!"<br />
<br />
He was insistent! Apparently<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"You never forget your aircraft's registration number!" </i></div>
<br />
...presumably because you're always writing it down on some form or other after you've worked on it.<br />
<br />
All I can remember is that the Hurricane was in Battle of Britain colours, had the 615 Squadron "KW" markings and that Dad was insistent it was his. I did take a photo of it for him but I've no idea where that photo is now.<br />
<br />
The guy in charge of the museum pricked Dad's bubble when he pointed out the Hurricane was a replica built for the 1966 film Battle of Britain, and was merely painted to look like Dad's aircraft.<br />
<br />
You can imagine that Dad was feeling a little deflated but then he perked up when the guy said that the real one was in the Imperial War Museum.<br />
<br />
As the years went by, remembering how emotional Dad had got at seeing his old aircraft, I kept suggesting we go to London to find it. My parents had a bit of a phobia about going to London and we never did but I never let go of the idea.<br />
<br />
When I was old enough, I travelled to London on my own and visited the Imperial War Museum to try and find his aircraft. Sadly my trip was fruitless.<br />
<br />
Years later I discovered that a new aircraft museum was being put together in Duxford near Cambridge and that it was part of the Imperial War Museum. So I figured that maybe his aircraft was there - but sadly not.<br />
<br />
The trail had gone cold and Dad died in 1981 never having seen his aircraft.<br />
<br />
After he died I got married and had two wonderful children and thought nothing more of Dad's old aircraft.<br />
<br />
In 2014 I started a Battle of Britain Twitter account called @BofB1940 as a summer project with my eldest son (Kit) to teach him something of the workings of social media.<br />
<br />
Using Battle of Britain records and history books I'd collected over the years, Kit and myself put together a real time Twitter feed for the Battle of Britain as if it was happening now.<br />
<br />
Spurred on by the unexpected success of @BofB1940, Kit started avidly consuming Battle of Britain reading material. His eye was drawn to one article that I'd never read, about the Hurricane in the Science Museum.<br />
<br />
Kit asked me to confirm that Dad's old squadron was 615 which I did.<br />
<br />
Apparently when we had visited the Science museum as a family for the first time only months before, the Hurricane we'd seen was actually from Dad's old squadron.<br />
<br />
Sadly I had no recollection of the registration number of Dad's old aircraft but I was lucky enough to find information from a Torbay Museum Guide that somebody had put on the Internet: it said<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Hawker Hurricane KW-Z (replica for the Battle of Britain film)</i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
This was progress, it told me that what Dad thought his old aircraft had the ident letter Z.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
The article that Kit found said that the Science Museum Hurricane had the following markings during its time with 615 Squadron:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>L1592 KW-Z</i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
This gave me more information and Google was now able to tell me:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Replica BAPC.63: initially marked L1592 KW-Z; currently marked SD-T located at the Hawkinge Museum, Kent</i></div>
<br />
Looking up the BAPC register, I was able to confirm that BAPC.63 was:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>P3208/SD-T Hawker Hurricane (full scale model), Kent Battle of Britain Musuem, Hawkinge - built for the film "Battle of Britain" ex L1592</i></div>
<br />
And for me this was conclusive proof:<br />
<br />
<br />
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>I had Torbay museum records from the Internet telling me what Dad saw was KW-Z. </li>
<li>I had aviation forums telling me the replica at Torbay was BAPC.63</li>
<li>I had the BAPC register saying BAPC.63 was originally marked as L1592 KW-Z</li>
<li>I had an article saying that L1592 was in the Science Museum and used to be marked KW-Z</li>
</ul>
<br />
So I am guessing when the guy at at Torbay Aircraft Museum said the original was in the Imperial War Museum, maybe he meant the Science Museum - or maybe there was a transfer from one to the other or maybe we weren't listening properly.<br />
<br />
We had found Dad's aircraft and it was in the Science Museum and we had all seen it (without realising it was his) only months before.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>I'd very much like to take my family back to the Science Museum soon, this time knowing that it was Dad's aircraft...and strangely I'd also like to visit the Hawkinge Battle of Britain Museum to see the exact replica that I stood in front of with my Dad...thinking it was his old aircraft.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
Then a further realisation dawned. If L1592 was definitely Dad's aircraft then presumably Dad would have known its pilot.<br />
<br />
Dad was at Kenley on 18 August when the aerodrome was bombed and Mum was in married quarters only a few miles away in Whyteleafe.<br />
<br />
On that same day, Dad's old aircraft and pilot were up flying in combat. Len Deighton has documented what happened in his book Fighter - The True Story Of The Battle Of Britain:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>18 August 1940</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Pilot Officer D. J. Looker in KW-Z was at an even greater disadvantage than the rest of 615 Squadron, for his usual aircraft was damaged, forcing him to fly in a Hurricane I, from reserve. It had fabric-covered wings and its fuel tanks were not self-sealing. Worse, from a handling point of view, it had a de Havilland variable-pitch (two-pitch) airscrew instead of a Rotol constant-speed propeller. This meant inferior performance and more work for the pilot.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>No. 615 Squadron were still using the old formation (four vees) and were flying tightly together in the pre-war style. Undoubtedly this made them easier to spot. They were bounced out of the sun by the Bf 109s they were looking for, and the tail of KW-Z was hit by cannon shells. The Hurricane went into a spin, but Looker was experienced enough to regain control of it. He was reluctant to bail out, having just spent a month in hospital with leg injuries after a dog-fight during the battles in France. He dodged through the balloon barrage cables that were there expressly to inhibit such flying, and then put the Hurricane down at the first landing field he saw. It was the pre-war London airport at Croydon. As he came in, he ran the gauntlet of the anti-aircraft guns who thought he was a German bomber.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Pilot Officer Looker survived, but incredibly one of the airport officials at Croydon made a written complaint about his airport being used as an emergency landing field. Looker's Hurricane also survived, to become an exhibit at London's Science Museum.</i></div>
<br />
<br />
I am of course pleased that Dad's old aircraft still exists but I am absolutely delighted that it was only my son's involvement, the Grandson he never met, that was the key to the whole mystery:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Kit had finally found his Grandad's old aircraft. Something that easily brings a tear to my eye.</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-58128921214873479732015-07-18T16:51:00.000-07:002015-08-21T08:05:43.934-07:00Boulton-Paul Defiant: Stupid Idea or Dreadful Leadership?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
The Boulton-Paul Defiant has been the subject of much discussion on the @BofB1940 twitter feed. Most have the view that the aircraft is a flawed concept, an idea that couldn't possibly have worked, an idea that needlessly cost lives.<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
A small minority on the @BofB1940 feed have defended the aircraft saying that it was Fighter Command's mis-use of the aircraft that was flawed, not the design concept. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>Slaughter of the Innocents</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
On the 19th July 1940, No 141 Squadron (Defiants) sent up nine aircraft (together with a Spitfire squadron and a Hurricane squadron) to intercept Bf110s that were reportedly dive bombing shipping off Dover. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Whilst they were still climbing, a group of Bf109s were sweeping high above the English Channel with perfect visibility. Undetected by the climbing Defiants, the Bf109s performed the perfect bounce and attacked from the sun.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
The brief but brutal combat resulted in the loss of six out of the nine Defiants and signalled the end of the RAF using them as daytime front-line fighters. No 141 Squadron was withdrawn to 13 Group and the Defiant was eventually relegated to that of a night fighter role.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Stupid Idea?</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Many people (like me) think that a fighter the size of a Spitfire with a less powerful engine, with the extra weight of a second crew member and a one ton turret is a really stupid idea.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
If you then take that stupid idea and make sure that the pilot has no forward firing armaments and that the turret can only fire upwards and that the gunner has to constantly tell the pilot what he's trying to shoot at - then this must surely be the most monumentally stupid idea of all human conflict?</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Such people (like me) can't understand why on earth the Boulton-Paul Defiant could possibly have been deployed into 11 Group as a day time front line fighter in Hell Fire Corner. We assumed that this "stupid idea" must have seemed a "good idea" a long time before the War, like the Blenheim, but by the time war broke out, it was out-dated. If that's true, what was it doing in Hell Fire Corner?<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>The Defiant at its Best</b></div>
<div>
<br />
It turns out that the Boulton-Paul Defiant was actually the newest fighter in the RAF which would explain why it was used in front-line day time duties in Fighter Command.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Sadly the Defiant wasn't designed as a fighter to take on single seat fighters, it was designed as a Bomber Destroyer to kill <i>unescorted</i> bombers.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
During the Winter of 1940, No 264 Squadron was equipped with the first ever Defiants. They developed new tactics for the new type. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
No 264 Squadron was Operational in March 1940 and was highly successful in the Battle for France.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
A properly trained Defiant squadron, it would seem, can be highly successful at destroying Ju87s, He111s and Ju88s. A valuable asset indeed for the Battle of Britain</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>No 264 Squadron (Defiants) had 64 enemy aircraft claimed destroyed for a loss of 14 Defiants.</i></div>
<h3 style="text-align: left;">
</h3>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>141 Squadron had its Own Ideas</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
No 141 Squadron was the second squadron to be equipped with Defiants but decided they would take little notice of the tactics developed by the highly successful 264 Squadron before it.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
When 141 Squadron was thrown into the heat of battle on 19 July 1940, it had none of the well trained, well thought through, tried and battle-tested tactics of 264 Squadron.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
<b>Defiants couldn't Speak to Spitfire or Hurricane Squadrons</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
One of the shortcomings of the Defiant (as highlighted by 264 Squadron but not fixed by Fighter Command) was that the Defiants were fitted with a different radio system to that of the rest of Fighter Command.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
When No 141 Squadron was sent up to engage the enemy on 19 July 1940 with a Spitfire squadron and a Hurricane squadron, they had no method of communicating with them.<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>The Defiant was an Unescorted Bomber Destroyer</b></div>
</div>
<div>
<br />
...so why on earth was 141 Squadron ever deployed to 11 Group. It was possibly the only Group in Fighter Command that was likely to have fighter escorted bombers almost all the time because it was so close to enemy airfields in France.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
No 141 Squadron would presumably have been far better deployed to 13 Group in Scotland or the East Coast.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Stupid Idea or Dreadful Leadership?</b></div>
<div>
<br />
Whilst I have always been of the view that the Boulton-Paul Defiant was a stupid idea, I had been ignorant of the tactics developed for it in 264 Squadron and how amazingly successful they had been in France.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I was also unaware that it's concept was one of the Unescorted Bomber Destroyer, for which (looking at 264's statistics) it would seem to have been remarkably well suited.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
This does leave me with these three burning questions:</div>
<div>
<ol style="text-align: left;">
<li>Why was No 141 Squadron leadership allowed to completely ignore battle-proven tactics as developed by No 264 Squadron and to go into battle on 19 July 1940 un-prepared?</li>
<li>Why was No 141 Squadron not deployed to a Group in Fighter Command where it was more likely to come across "unescorted bombers", like Scotland or the East Coast?</li>
<li>Why was the interoperability issue not addressed regarding the different radio systems used on Defiants?</li>
</ol>
<div>
For me, thanks to No 264 Squadron, I no longer consider the Defiant a stupid idea. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>It doesn't sound like a flawed concept but a niche and specialist role.</i></div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I have to say that I'm a convert. I now agree with the small minority on the @BofB1940 feed who say it wasn't the Defiant that was the problem, it was the leadership...the leadership of No 141 Squadron and the leadership of Fighter Command.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><br /></b>
<b>
Churchill wanted Defiants but Dowding wanted Spitfires & Hurricanes</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Churchill supported the concept of the Defiant but Dowding wanted fast single-seater forward-firing fighters.<br />
<br />
Dowding only equipped two of his squadrons with Defiants and when one of them suffered heavy losses it gave him the ideal reason to withdraw Defiants from his front line.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Was it Dowding's lack of enthusiasm for the Defiant that created the conditions which led to a series of leadership failures that resulted in No 141 Squadron suffering such heavy losses?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Churchill later felt that he'd been wrong to support the Defiant...but maybe he hadn't been, maybe he'd been ignorant of the leadership failings surrounding No 141...he might even have been ignorant of the incredible successes of No 264 Squadron.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>
Why was No 264 Squadron Withdrawn from Operations?</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
By May 1940, the successful No 264 Squadron started to suffer mounting losses as the Luftwaffe discovered the Defiant was vulnerable to frontal attack. 264 was withdrawn from operations as a day fighter and started to train for the night fighter role.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Nevertheless, had Defiant squadrons been restricted to that of Unescorted Bomber Destroyer, maybe 264 would have faired better.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Maybe it was right that the Defiants were withdrawn but maybe there was also an element of self-fulfillment about Dowding's prophecy.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><br /></b>
<b>Should the Defiant have been Withdrawn?</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>Is it possible that if enough Defiant squadrons had followed the battle-proven tactics and training of 264 </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...and if Fighter Command and ensured that all Defiants could have communicated properly with their protecting Spitfire and Hurricane squadrons </i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...and if Fighter Command had ensured that Defiants were largely engaging with unescorted bombers by deploying them into Scotland and the East Coast and freeing up single seat fighters for 11 Group,</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...is it possible that the RAF's newest fighter, the Defiant, could have come out of the Battle of Britain with high scores and low losses</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>...and when we said the words Spitfire and Hurricane with patriotic pride, perhaps we might also have said <b>Boulton-Paul Defiant.</b></i></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com12tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-82573977347722080782015-07-17T17:08:00.000-07:002015-08-21T08:05:57.108-07:00Stop the Traffic! We Want to Take Off!<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
During the early part of the Battle of Britain, entries in the Campaign Diaries frequent mention is made of RAF Catterick in 13 Group being unserviceable.<br />
<br />
Even when it was serviceable there was often a caveat saying "unserviceable during hours of darkness".<br />
<br />
What could be the reason for the unreliable nature of this 13 Group Sector Station?<br />
<br />
There is no explanation in the Campaign Diaries and there is no mention of any bomb damage putting it out of action.<br />
<br />
I can not find any mention of it being an unreliable aerodrome or for being famous for its poor weather record.<br />
<br />
RAF Catterick would appear to have only a single runway and I wondered if it might have been prone to flooding but I couldn't find any mention of it anywhere and let's face it...IT'S JULY...even in Scotland!<br />
<br />
In summary, I'm not convinced that Catterick's poor serviceability record at the beginning of the Battle of Britain was either due to the weather or due to enemy action.<br />
<br />
For me the most plausible reason occurred to me when I read an article in the <a href="http://www.wartimememoriesproject.com/ww2/airfields/airfield.php?pid=1702" target="_blank">Wartime Memories Project</a> and it stated that:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>The runway at Catterick was so close to the A1 that traffic had to be stopped to allow Spitfires to take off</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
For me, this would explain why it was unserviceable so often...in those days the A-roads were the main transport trunk roads, there were no motorways (unlike in Germany where Hitler had realised the benefit of a good road system to a mechanised army). So I think the RAF might have wanted to disrupt traffic on the A1 as few times as possible.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
It also presumably meant that a Squadron Scramble order would have had a slower response, because you would have had to stop the traffic first.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
If I was the RAF in the day, I'm sure I'd have thought, "If we've got any other options, let's try and <i>not</i> use Catterick!"</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I think this might also explain why, even when Catterick was serviceable it was unserviceable during the hours of darkness...trying to stop traffic during the hours of darkness during a Blackout where none of the cars are allowed bright enough headlights...would be a positively dangerous occupation.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I'm guessing as the Battle of Britain intensified though, priorities changed and Catterick would have been used more and more...and somehow dealt with the traffic issues.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
This is only my conjecture but it does allow for the historical interpretation that:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>far from Catterick being frequently broken, I believe that instead it may have been frequently operational but just too close to the A1</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
...and the British being British, the RAF may have thought that to fly too often from Catterick would have been dreadfully inconsiderate...until later in the Battle of course when Catterick did tremendous work. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
</div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472643010060328177.post-41857294406017598382015-07-17T16:03:00.000-07:002015-08-21T08:06:09.146-07:00Aft Firing Bf109s? Seriously?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.gofundme.com/m32c5xsg" target="_blank"><<< If you like what we do, please click here to support us >>></a></div>
<br />
The Battle of Britain Campaign Diaries have an Air Intelligence entry for 14 July 1940 that states:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>British pilots again reporting Bf109s fitted with cannon firing aft</i></div>
<br />
When @BofB1940 tweeted this it was the subject of great interest. Bf109s never had any kind of rear firing ordnance so why were there ongoing reports from British pilots that there were?<br />
<br />
It seems completely fanciful that a British pilot would mis-identify a Bf109 with another Luftwaffe type that did fire backwards because all those two engines...except one.<br />
<br />
The only single engined Luftwaffe aircraft that could fire backwards was the Ju87 Stuka but that was so distinctive with its fixed undercarriage and gull wings that it surely could not have been mixed up with a Bf109.<br />
<br />
So mis-identification seems easy to rule out.<br />
<br />
Another possibility might be that an unseen aircraft were firing at the British pilots who had attributed it to an aft firing Bf109 that they were chasing.<br />
<br />
The best clue for the most plausible explanation came from a passage, pointed out to us from one of our followers, from Adolf Galland's The First And The Last.<br />
<br />
Adolf Galland explained how he had got into a bit of a fix later in the war in his Fw190. In the passage he describes how he'd got himself into a weak position with no good options with enemy fighters on his tail. He describes how he used a technique that had already saved his life twice during the Battle of Britain, which was:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>to fire everything he had into the clear blue sky ahead and it fooled the enemy fighters into thinking he was firing back at them and they broke off the engagement.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Adolf Galland was a very influential German fighter pilot during the Battle of Britain and it seems likely that if this technique had saved his life a couple of times, he might have recommended it to his pilots under his command.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I guess if you think you are chasing an enemy aircraft, he is completely defenceless and you have him in your sights, both of you know that this can only end one way...when...there is belching smoke from his guns. It's probably human nature to fear the worst and assume that he's firing back at you, after all...why on earth would he fire forwards.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
In the highly charged atmosphere of mortal aerial combat and in the knowledge that you are fighting an ingenious enemy who is always making violent improvements to his aircraft...I guess the natural reaction would be to play safe and bunk out.<br />
<br />
After all, a "dumb" (fixed position) machine gun was actually fitted into the tail of some He111s (just behind the rudder) and the Luftwaffe even experimented with fitting aft-firing flame-throwers to some of their aircraft. The flame-thrower idea was short-lived though once they realised the sight of the easily seen flame attracted more British fighters than it scared off.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Thank you to all those who took part in the debate on Twitter. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
If you're not already following us, do follow @BofB1940 for real time tweets of aircraft crashes, pilots, places, engagements, news and facts.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
See you over there</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
by Steve Dunster</div>
<br />
<br /></div>
Steve Dunsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15496482528494931171noreply@blogger.com4